Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-06 16:46:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E5FDC635DDA6881C69EFABBE5FF486B9C24C7A6B3AFD9DA43127F7028DF7D15C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Contrary to the suggested note, tweet does not claim bill specifically uses the words 'genital inspections'. Further, given Section 2(c)(1) of the bill, it's not unreasonable to claim this will lead to such inspections, beyond the usual "physical examination." Note unnecessary. http://kslegislature.org/li/b2023_24/measures/documents/hb2238_enrolled.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1644006637680640000
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E5FDC635DDA6881C69EFABBE5FF486B9C24C7A6B3AFD9DA43127F7028DF7D15C
  • createdAtMillis - 1680799561914
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1644006637680640000E5FDC635DDA6881C69EFABBE5FF486B9C24C7A6B3AFD9DA43127F7028DF7D15C