Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-06 16:04:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D74C15C42D95ABD80C23895504E9602D1BF2751F62E8F65DA598E9692D3EC743
Participant Details

Original Note:

Contrary to the suggested note, tweet does not claim bill specifically uses the words 'genital inspections'. Further, given Section 2(c)(1) of the bill, it's not unreasonable to claim this will lead to such inspections, beyond the usual "physical examination." Note unnecessary. http://kslegislature.org/li/b2023_24/measures/documents/hb2238_enrolled.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1644006637680640000
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D74C15C42D95ABD80C23895504E9602D1BF2751F62E8F65DA598E9692D3EC743
  • createdAtMillis - 1680797052139
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1644006637680640000D74C15C42D95ABD80C23895504E9602D1BF2751F62E8F65DA598E9692D3EC743