Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-07 03:42:18 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6F29D790044391FB8E4E1D486E23D24C302FBED275CBED408F8F6732F491DBE7
Participant Details

Original Note:

Contrary to the suggested note, tweet does not claim bill specifically uses the words 'genital inspections'. Further, given Section 2(c)(1) of the bill, it's not unreasonable to claim this will lead to such inspections, beyond the usual "physical examination." Note unnecessary. http://kslegislature.org/li/b2023_24/measures/documents/hb2238_enrolled.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1644006637680640000
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6F29D790044391FB8E4E1D486E23D24C302FBED275CBED408F8F6732F491DBE7
  • createdAtMillis - 1680838938182
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16440066376806400006F29D790044391FB8E4E1D486E23D24C302FBED275CBED408F8F6732F491DBE7