Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-06 17:22:20 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 107AAFF9CBF35E8DB7A2680741054625AF450FC4BE7D96FE00B2A4ACABCD268E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Contrary to the suggested note, tweet does not claim bill specifically uses the words 'genital inspections'. Further, given Section 2(c)(1) of the bill, it's not unreasonable to claim this will lead to such inspections, beyond the usual "physical examination." Note unnecessary. http://kslegislature.org/li/b2023_24/measures/documents/hb2238_enrolled.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1644006637680640000
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 107AAFF9CBF35E8DB7A2680741054625AF450FC4BE7D96FE00B2A4ACABCD268E
  • createdAtMillis - 1680801740039
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1644006637680640000107AAFF9CBF35E8DB7A2680741054625AF450FC4BE7D96FE00B2A4ACABCD268E