Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-06 17:41:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 371A9265158B6ED2E15B1B9B7F8E7AC22E61EFDCBEF70D772B506A8D16C6AF8C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Currently proposed note is speculating as to legal status of the unreported gifts; while it is very possible that Thomas's failure to report this income was legal, the story has just broken and no serious analysis has been done.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1644005340587999241
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 371A9265158B6ED2E15B1B9B7F8E7AC22E61EFDCBEF70D772B506A8D16C6AF8C
  • createdAtMillis - 1680802888171
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1644005340587999241371A9265158B6ED2E15B1B9B7F8E7AC22E61EFDCBEF70D772B506A8D16C6AF8C