Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-06 21:19:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 359A2B3E6868FF71E8E9FF40F711CC25AE69259F400C2D61B0FAC540CB6B5E4B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Currently proposed note is speculating as to legal status of the unreported gifts; while it is very possible that Thomas's failure to report this income was legal, the story has just broken and no serious analysis has been done.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1644005340587999241
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 359A2B3E6868FF71E8E9FF40F711CC25AE69259F400C2D61B0FAC540CB6B5E4B
  • createdAtMillis - 1680815978480
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1644005340587999241359A2B3E6868FF71E8E9FF40F711CC25AE69259F400C2D61B0FAC540CB6B5E4B