Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-07 14:20:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E3B56E3C75E380286D6D9A6EEC48E79893E13421B6088713EC73E335E6CB1884
Participant Details

Original Note:

Weisman misleadingly presents the concern in the thread as being about 'the article's point of view,' and ignores the specific critique it raises about his vague use of the term 'analysts' to present a specific point of view as the primary one held by 'analysts' in general.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1643994822951280640
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E3B56E3C75E380286D6D9A6EEC48E79893E13421B6088713EC73E335E6CB1884
  • createdAtMillis - 1680877201103
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1643994822951280640E3B56E3C75E380286D6D9A6EEC48E79893E13421B6088713EC73E335E6CB1884