Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-07 20:19:09 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 72E23C45FE8916E77D481EE11A501C9783E1008F0BC02490E0BE6CED792B3221
Participant Details

Original Note:

Weisman misleadingly presents the concern in the thread as being about 'the article's point of view,' and ignores the specific critique it raises about his vague use of the term 'analysts' to present a specific point of view as the primary one held by 'analysts' in general.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1643994822951280640
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 72E23C45FE8916E77D481EE11A501C9783E1008F0BC02490E0BE6CED792B3221
  • createdAtMillis - 1680898749810
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 164399482295128064072E23C45FE8916E77D481EE11A501C9783E1008F0BC02490E0BE6CED792B3221