Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-04-05 16:41:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: C966E0BA5803EDA2B9ADEA1A226B5D5FB13629349A2D9A920F01C5137F8AF13B
Participant Details
Original Note:
No note needed. This Tweet is correct, as no specific harm was referenced in the indictment. Only copy/pasted and unclear language. This has led to criticism of Bragg by legal experts on both sides. Bragg also admitted that he did not “specify what laws were broken.” https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2023/04/04/bragg_new_york_law_does_not_require_me_to_specify_what_laws_that_trump_may_have_broken.html https://nypost.com/2023/04/04/braggs-case-is-a-legal-mess-what-is-he-even-charging-trump-with/ https://www.nationalreview.com/2023/04/braggs-indictment-even-fails-as-an-indictment/ https://www.nbcnews.com/video/manhattan-d-a-alvin-bragg-discusses-charges-against-trump-168073285544
All Note Details