Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-05 06:33:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B81E5BB254A609770A08D4E04F69B8CB7C54F95A427285D9EE541F8FF802D29D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet is misleading - both tweets merely linked to articles which contained her photo. The photos of the judges daughter were not attached to their tweets as images.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1643407816030339073
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B81E5BB254A609770A08D4E04F69B8CB7C54F95A427285D9EE541F8FF802D29D
  • createdAtMillis - 1680676393772
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1643407816030339073B81E5BB254A609770A08D4E04F69B8CB7C54F95A427285D9EE541F8FF802D29D