Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-05 05:08:10 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 683DCE9FF994D11CB6A298308644BAA36CD667F2A9C1D6D6E9780291AE96231D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet is misleading - both tweets merely linked to articles which contained her photo. The photos of the judges daughter were not attached to their tweets as images.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1643407816030339073
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 683DCE9FF994D11CB6A298308644BAA36CD667F2A9C1D6D6E9780291AE96231D
  • createdAtMillis - 1680671290397
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1643407816030339073683DCE9FF994D11CB6A298308644BAA36CD667F2A9C1D6D6E9780291AE96231D