Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-05 12:40:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4BDDBDF2E50FB23F7C7CC3AF3578DC6A3E1D7CAA14B71A275AA8A161AC249411
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet is misleading - both tweets merely linked to articles which contained her photo. The photos of the judges daughter were not attached to their tweets as images.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1643407816030339073
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4BDDBDF2E50FB23F7C7CC3AF3578DC6A3E1D7CAA14B71A275AA8A161AC249411
  • createdAtMillis - 1680698451586
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16434078160303390734BDDBDF2E50FB23F7C7CC3AF3578DC6A3E1D7CAA14B71A275AA8A161AC249411