Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-05 16:11:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 20124B8173F4EF509048FCD5CE65DA5E08E7E36089AE5C933C1B245C8CC9A8A5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet is misleading - both tweets merely linked to articles which contained her photo. The photos of the judges daughter were not attached to their tweets as images.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1643407816030339073
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 20124B8173F4EF509048FCD5CE65DA5E08E7E36089AE5C933C1B245C8CC9A8A5
  • createdAtMillis - 1680711081203
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 164340781603033907320124B8173F4EF509048FCD5CE65DA5E08E7E36089AE5C933C1B245C8CC9A8A5