Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-05 01:11:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1D0EE1E7326E3B7E3AE963906347A471CFE4291DA1E3F0D5FB1D98496E0A89C3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet is misleading - both tweets merely linked to articles which contained her photo. The photos of the judges daughter were not attached to their tweets as images.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1643407816030339073
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1D0EE1E7326E3B7E3AE963906347A471CFE4291DA1E3F0D5FB1D98496E0A89C3
  • createdAtMillis - 1680657088989
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16434078160303390731D0EE1E7326E3B7E3AE963906347A471CFE4291DA1E3F0D5FB1D98496E0A89C3