Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-04 23:43:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FA634FD74F442746A3DB016383AC908445C99DF9C084E82CCBA0FFD096553AD5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet is factually incorrect. Censorship is not part of the code. The Twitter algorithm is open source for everyone's review. https://blog.twitter.com/engineering/en_us/topics/open-source/2023/twitter-recommendation-algorithm https://github.com/twitter/the-algorithm https://github.com/twitter/the-algorithm-ml

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1642955961366134787
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FA634FD74F442746A3DB016383AC908445C99DF9C084E82CCBA0FFD096553AD5
  • createdAtMillis - 1680651832303
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1642955961366134787FA634FD74F442746A3DB016383AC908445C99DF9C084E82CCBA0FFD096553AD5