Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-03 14:59:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E04B399BEB4F1EBED3149C2D4A8748F84D2ED886001DD61469CACE33EBC1E492
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note not needed. The tweet is part fact (as note above even admits) and part clear opinion. Whether the metric she uses is relevant is a debate for the replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1642785483519303682
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E04B399BEB4F1EBED3149C2D4A8748F84D2ED886001DD61469CACE33EBC1E492
  • createdAtMillis - 1680533960354
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1642785483519303682E04B399BEB4F1EBED3149C2D4A8748F84D2ED886001DD61469CACE33EBC1E492