Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-03 14:05:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9592368210F6144604E1FA0AC1F2A0E60595FF8AFEEB4265CAB942303B737877
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note not needed. The tweet is part fact (as note above even admits) and part clear opinion. Whether the metric she uses is relevant is a debate for the replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1642785483519303682
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9592368210F6144604E1FA0AC1F2A0E60595FF8AFEEB4265CAB942303B737877
  • createdAtMillis - 1680530731400
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16427854835193036829592368210F6144604E1FA0AC1F2A0E60595FF8AFEEB4265CAB942303B737877