Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-03 15:09:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 39FC64EE74C301D51DE58A5A3091860596E67848312E0E1A2063444E18296AF6
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note not needed. The tweet is part fact (as note above even admits) and part clear opinion. Whether the metric she uses is relevant is a debate for the replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1642785483519303682
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 39FC64EE74C301D51DE58A5A3091860596E67848312E0E1A2063444E18296AF6
  • createdAtMillis - 1680534594623
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 164278548351930368239FC64EE74C301D51DE58A5A3091860596E67848312E0E1A2063444E18296AF6