Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-03 02:31:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4C697006B1DFDF2CA441CF028B875A8F9F961F5321C0C19A9F6ECD3C96990ABA
Participant Details

Original Note:

Adding a correction to the note, he was not found "innocent" by a jury of his peers (a legal impossibility in the US), he was found "not guilty." https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/not_guilty

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1642712305367384069
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4C697006B1DFDF2CA441CF028B875A8F9F961F5321C0C19A9F6ECD3C96990ABA
  • createdAtMillis - 1680489107211
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16427123053673840694C697006B1DFDF2CA441CF028B875A8F9F961F5321C0C19A9F6ECD3C96990ABA