Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-02 22:47:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C0E543640EB073D27B8807A8613584CB0A539A899FE9AF3E1BCF52D76BC1DF4C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Autora da publicação expressa a opinião sobre o fato, a opinião não é tendenciosa e abre o debate publico sobre uma decisão do judiciário. no decorre do tempo tem aberto muitas jurisprudências, pois cada membro tem uma tese e linha de pensamento. Ex.: https://portal.stf.jus.br/noticias/verNoticiaDetalhe.asp?idConteudo=502140&ori=1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1642359831381135361
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C0E543640EB073D27B8807A8613584CB0A539A899FE9AF3E1BCF52D76BC1DF4C
  • createdAtMillis - 1680475625379
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1642359831381135361C0E543640EB073D27B8807A8613584CB0A539A899FE9AF3E1BCF52D76BC1DF4C