Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-01 22:16:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D47B0D7E2C73C48E47A7E108F81FF6C8D3A69D5E3A76AA276FAD6F1E1057F1B8
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the study could be incorrect, the tweet isn’t misleading - the study did come up with this estimate, and the methodology is documented. Tesla’s refutation is the top reply, so already very visible. Note not needed here.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1641855882618368000
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D47B0D7E2C73C48E47A7E108F81FF6C8D3A69D5E3A76AA276FAD6F1E1057F1B8
  • createdAtMillis - 1680387395416
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1641855882618368000D47B0D7E2C73C48E47A7E108F81FF6C8D3A69D5E3A76AA276FAD6F1E1057F1B8