Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-31 21:11:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8F56D86CD9577FF17BB3369CA892EEC4E9CF26F6FF42A0F8474A74968724654A
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the study could be incorrect, the tweet isn’t misleading - the study did come up with this estimate, and the methodology is documented. Tesla’s refutation is the top reply, so already very visible. Note not needed here.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1641855882618368000
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8F56D86CD9577FF17BB3369CA892EEC4E9CF26F6FF42A0F8474A74968724654A
  • createdAtMillis - 1680297090743
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16418558826183680008F56D86CD9577FF17BB3369CA892EEC4E9CF26F6FF42A0F8474A74968724654A