Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-01 15:48:19 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 442C29622612F9BE2EC1F00D7F3B80B1034084BDC7FC3F0AB0BD46C440845B55
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the study could be incorrect, the tweet isn’t misleading - the study did come up with this estimate, and the methodology is documented. Tesla’s refutation is the top reply, so already very visible. Note not needed here.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1641855882618368000
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 442C29622612F9BE2EC1F00D7F3B80B1034084BDC7FC3F0AB0BD46C440845B55
  • createdAtMillis - 1680364099163
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1641855882618368000442C29622612F9BE2EC1F00D7F3B80B1034084BDC7FC3F0AB0BD46C440845B55