Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-31 18:03:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3B4A842A09CF54D087EF8F10F59E2F89A5036371639CD1D96BB0BDD8A61052C1
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the study could be incorrect, the tweet isn’t misleading - the study did come up with this estimate, and the methodology is documented. Tesla’s refutation is the top reply, so already very visible. Note not needed here.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1641855882618368000
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3B4A842A09CF54D087EF8F10F59E2F89A5036371639CD1D96BB0BDD8A61052C1
  • createdAtMillis - 1680285808940
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16418558826183680003B4A842A09CF54D087EF8F10F59E2F89A5036371639CD1D96BB0BDD8A61052C1