Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-31 17:35:10 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 243F5D3E35AEF44CD3E95AAA9AFD6D8CF4DC888D58C88FB3B35F606DED6C5762
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the study could be incorrect, the tweet isn’t misleading - the study did come up with this estimate, and the methodology is documented. Tesla’s refutation is the top reply, so already very visible. Note not needed here.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1641855882618368000
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 243F5D3E35AEF44CD3E95AAA9AFD6D8CF4DC888D58C88FB3B35F606DED6C5762
  • createdAtMillis - 1680284110009
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1641855882618368000243F5D3E35AEF44CD3E95AAA9AFD6D8CF4DC888D58C88FB3B35F606DED6C5762