Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-31 11:57:50 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 227B72516F48209D4CD398BD566B39A53B64980200BCA4A4C749072F49AA8384
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no evidence given that a NATO base was destroyed by a RU strike, this tweet contains wholly unsubstantiated claims. In addition to the lack of corroborating information, the image used here is misleading as it is from a petrol market in Syria https://www.facebook.com/SyriaCivilDef/videos/259574842337850/?mibextid=rS40aB7S9Ucbxw6v

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1641488408538226688
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 227B72516F48209D4CD398BD566B39A53B64980200BCA4A4C749072F49AA8384
  • createdAtMillis - 1680263870075
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1641488408538226688227B72516F48209D4CD398BD566B39A53B64980200BCA4A4C749072F49AA8384