Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-31 06:58:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C465F2CB71D9FF677083EB1726E19F0B9CD4246CFD4E0CE796E192C69FC3AB3E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The above note addresses a different statistic than the tweet—incidences versus reach of those incidences. If you believe that lessened reach outweighs an increase in incidences, then make that point in the tweet replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1641478552729137163
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C465F2CB71D9FF677083EB1726E19F0B9CD4246CFD4E0CE796E192C69FC3AB3E
  • createdAtMillis - 1680245900729
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1641478552729137163C465F2CB71D9FF677083EB1726E19F0B9CD4246CFD4E0CE796E192C69FC3AB3E