Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-31 06:17:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B79C6466602BF1E769ED7849F6524E8CBBEADF8C080E2C68005AEB40B5C081D9
Participant Details

Original Note:

The above note addresses a different statistic than the tweet—incidences versus reach of those incidences. If you believe that lessened reach outweighs an increase in incidences, then make that point in the tweet replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1641478552729137163
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B79C6466602BF1E769ED7849F6524E8CBBEADF8C080E2C68005AEB40B5C081D9
  • createdAtMillis - 1680243428848
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1641478552729137163B79C6466602BF1E769ED7849F6524E8CBBEADF8C080E2C68005AEB40B5C081D9