Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-31 07:04:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 176A6D0A4616553A5AC39B071BBD5DE4F76125D868E5C973A3032ECF06E1E175
Participant Details

Original Note:

User is clearly jokingly paraphrasing and pointing out the irony in the response from the Schultz. No note needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1641212401768091648
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 176A6D0A4616553A5AC39B071BBD5DE4F76125D868E5C973A3032ECF06E1E175
  • createdAtMillis - 1680246274967
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1641212401768091648176A6D0A4616553A5AC39B071BBD5DE4F76125D868E5C973A3032ECF06E1E175