Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-30 05:04:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 00046B9FDBEB4D6EE2A594DFA48D5515CE2AE7CF5ED97A7A0ED84FD634F6544E
Participant Details

Original Note:

User is clearly jokingly paraphrasing and pointing out the irony in the response from the Schultz. No note needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1641212401768091648
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 00046B9FDBEB4D6EE2A594DFA48D5515CE2AE7CF5ED97A7A0ED84FD634F6544E
  • createdAtMillis - 1680152670655
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 164121240176809164800046B9FDBEB4D6EE2A594DFA48D5515CE2AE7CF5ED97A7A0ED84FD634F6544E