Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-30 01:42:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FA634FD74F442746A3DB016383AC908445C99DF9C084E82CCBA0FFD096553AD5
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed - personal opinion expressed in the Tweet (that I agree is likely to be wrong, as the proposed note stated. But, it is only semantics and premature). A note here would be unneccessary. Responses should go in the replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1641184937544933376
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FA634FD74F442746A3DB016383AC908445C99DF9C084E82CCBA0FFD096553AD5
  • createdAtMillis - 1680140528616
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1641184937544933376FA634FD74F442746A3DB016383AC908445C99DF9C084E82CCBA0FFD096553AD5