Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-29 22:03:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 827AE6C6088E810094720621259B332C0205BDA171B80341418960D11B8FC94C
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed - personal opinion expressed in the Tweet (that I agree is likely to be wrong, as the proposed note stated. But, it is only semantics and premature). A note here would be unneccessary. Responses should go in the replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1641184937544933376
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 827AE6C6088E810094720621259B332C0205BDA171B80341418960D11B8FC94C
  • createdAtMillis - 1680127404295
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1641184937544933376827AE6C6088E810094720621259B332C0205BDA171B80341418960D11B8FC94C