Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-30 16:07:36 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1504EF769FBC5ADF4F2F9EB79EDDD0FB11A2A03834F51724450913F32E164048
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed - personal opinion expressed in the Tweet (that I agree is likely to be wrong, as the proposed note stated. But, it is only semantics and premature). A note here would be unneccessary. Responses should go in the replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1641184937544933376
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1504EF769FBC5ADF4F2F9EB79EDDD0FB11A2A03834F51724450913F32E164048
  • createdAtMillis - 1680192456700
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16411849375449333761504EF769FBC5ADF4F2F9EB79EDDD0FB11A2A03834F51724450913F32E164048