Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-26 23:21:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 32A53FAF41BE23170745B997D27B91E4E0EBFA7E48D4DE935CB67DC93B64192B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Especialistas afirmam que o site criado não atende aos requisitos básicos de uma plataforma de checagem, especialmente pela falta de independência e apartidarismo. Afirmam também que "alguns conteúdos 'verificados' são, na realidade, 'notas de esclarecimento' do governo". https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/poder/2023/03/agencias-de-checagem-veem-politizacao-em-acao-de-lula-contra-fake-news.shtml

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1641030536452866049
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 32A53FAF41BE23170745B997D27B91E4E0EBFA7E48D4DE935CB67DC93B64192B
  • createdAtMillis - 1682551288561
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 164103053645286604932A53FAF41BE23170745B997D27B91E4E0EBFA7E48D4DE935CB67DC93B64192B