Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-29 05:24:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 672361C37E89183DA434809563B5DF6F93E2D56E257B9165517750DF0D3B2BDE
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. It is unreasonable to scrutinize pathologists and virologists offering their expert opinions. All medical experts should have the freedom to share their findings without linking info that is changing rapidly. It is important for positive future health outcomes. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/writing-and-rating-impact.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1640942931577118720
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 672361C37E89183DA434809563B5DF6F93E2D56E257B9165517750DF0D3B2BDE
  • createdAtMillis - 1680067484452
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1640942931577118720672361C37E89183DA434809563B5DF6F93E2D56E257B9165517750DF0D3B2BDE