Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-29 06:04:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 549FE27CE819B97EB0C0389C90FB618E9A07FBBE380457989BC12AB54C65E4DE
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. It is unreasonable to scrutinize pathologists and virologists offering their expert opinions. All medical experts should have the freedom to share their findings without linking info that is changing rapidly. It is important for positive future health outcomes. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/writing-and-rating-impact.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1640942931577118720
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 549FE27CE819B97EB0C0389C90FB618E9A07FBBE380457989BC12AB54C65E4DE
  • createdAtMillis - 1680069854191
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1640942931577118720549FE27CE819B97EB0C0389C90FB618E9A07FBBE380457989BC12AB54C65E4DE