Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-29 03:05:53 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EEEE252E1BF4EDE674F31B6EF1A4960A519AA6848BAE072C577E12CB1AAAEE1C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet’s claim is supported by data analytic methodology clearly explained by the study’s authors (employed with Phinance Technologies). Discussion about contrary methodology or disagreement belongs in the comments. http://www.phinancetechnologies.com/HumanityProjects/Resources/Report%20on%20measuring%20death%20rates%20-%20V3%20-%20US.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1640897015495421952
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EEEE252E1BF4EDE674F31B6EF1A4960A519AA6848BAE072C577E12CB1AAAEE1C
  • createdAtMillis - 1680059153524
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1640897015495421952EEEE252E1BF4EDE674F31B6EF1A4960A519AA6848BAE072C577E12CB1AAAEE1C