Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-28 20:59:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FD3B12C34AAE72FEBAEAEBF268E92233511D306335F47D3B64E8E2167E57E6A0
Participant Details

Original Note:

Most media outlets have stated they are not covering the so called "twitter files" because "The chief reason most news organizations aren’t up in arms about the story is because the releases have largely not contained any revelatory information." https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/12/media/twitter-files-reliable-sources/index.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1640727443861323777
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FD3B12C34AAE72FEBAEAEBF268E92233511D306335F47D3B64E8E2167E57E6A0
  • createdAtMillis - 1680037159526
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1640727443861323777FD3B12C34AAE72FEBAEAEBF268E92233511D306335F47D3B64E8E2167E57E6A0