Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-28 20:50:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AD75BA9497A4432360D7B2ADA97BA29EF4AA6BC8080D55E3774E311EE9D8C95C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Most media outlets have stated they are not covering the so called "twitter files" because "The chief reason most news organizations aren’t up in arms about the story is because the releases have largely not contained any revelatory information." https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/12/media/twitter-files-reliable-sources/index.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1640727443861323777
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AD75BA9497A4432360D7B2ADA97BA29EF4AA6BC8080D55E3774E311EE9D8C95C
  • createdAtMillis - 1680036659772
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1640727443861323777AD75BA9497A4432360D7B2ADA97BA29EF4AA6BC8080D55E3774E311EE9D8C95C