Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-28 15:16:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 83FEF76206F4DC8CD9906D9FC71A16E4A82DEDD7EE9EA563D7514F3A82611DA8
Participant Details

Original Note:

Most media outlets have stated they are not covering the so called "twitter files" because "The chief reason most news organizations aren’t up in arms about the story is because the releases have largely not contained any revelatory information." https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/12/media/twitter-files-reliable-sources/index.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1640727443861323777
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 83FEF76206F4DC8CD9906D9FC71A16E4A82DEDD7EE9EA563D7514F3A82611DA8
  • createdAtMillis - 1680016577700
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 164072744386132377783FEF76206F4DC8CD9906D9FC71A16E4A82DEDD7EE9EA563D7514F3A82611DA8