Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-28 19:56:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0C14028293363D3E5CA31C791ED98C819B5D889C1BE4000E03C80BDEC124E7FA
Participant Details

Original Note:

Most media outlets have stated they are not covering the so called "twitter files" because "The chief reason most news organizations aren’t up in arms about the story is because the releases have largely not contained any revelatory information." https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/12/media/twitter-files-reliable-sources/index.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1640727443861323777
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0C14028293363D3E5CA31C791ED98C819B5D889C1BE4000E03C80BDEC124E7FA
  • createdAtMillis - 1680033370086
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16407274438613237770C14028293363D3E5CA31C791ED98C819B5D889C1BE4000E03C80BDEC124E7FA