Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-28 09:27:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BF4BB2AC35AFB262DEEFD85C4902B8F4F14CD0254FBFBA53176F9C5DE99DEE2F
Participant Details

Original Note:

This might have been misleading if it was a screenshot with the date cut off. As a retweet, the original date is easily viewable and the retweeter doesn’t seem to imply it’s recent. Note not needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1640564042657058816
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BF4BB2AC35AFB262DEEFD85C4902B8F4F14CD0254FBFBA53176F9C5DE99DEE2F
  • createdAtMillis - 1679995627460
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1640564042657058816BF4BB2AC35AFB262DEEFD85C4902B8F4F14CD0254FBFBA53176F9C5DE99DEE2F