Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-27 10:34:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EFE9B8314C0FB0A3BE4907DCE3B58B0E4B8EAED4F08960689A5D91B9A809CCB2
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the thrust of this tweet is correct (don't rely on it getting things right if it's important), the claim that ChatGPT's error rate is "by design" is false. OpenAI is transparent about ChatGPT's limitations; it is a tech demo, and should be treated as such. https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1640225322191708160
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EFE9B8314C0FB0A3BE4907DCE3B58B0E4B8EAED4F08960689A5D91B9A809CCB2
  • createdAtMillis - 1679913256299
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1640225322191708160EFE9B8314C0FB0A3BE4907DCE3B58B0E4B8EAED4F08960689A5D91B9A809CCB2