Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-27 10:10:40 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9B9B4CCA99835B1EC62E06CA4C757C3A3EACE0FB0C95A9AFCB585C2DFC5E24B3
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the thrust of this tweet is correct (don't rely on it getting things right if it's important), the claim that ChatGPT's error rate is "by design" is false. OpenAI is transparent about ChatGPT's limitations; it is a tech demo, and should be treated as such. https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1640225322191708160
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9B9B4CCA99835B1EC62E06CA4C757C3A3EACE0FB0C95A9AFCB585C2DFC5E24B3
  • createdAtMillis - 1679911840726
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16402253221917081609B9B4CCA99835B1EC62E06CA4C757C3A3EACE0FB0C95A9AFCB585C2DFC5E24B3