Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-27 10:40:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3DB9A9BFA8F7A17A52D354D21DF008C4029727F3E8F4E6B7CD1449831C73A204
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the thrust of this tweet is correct (don't rely on it getting things right if it's important), the claim that ChatGPT's error rate is "by design" is false. OpenAI is transparent about ChatGPT's limitations; it is a tech demo, and should be treated as such. https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1640225322191708160
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3DB9A9BFA8F7A17A52D354D21DF008C4029727F3E8F4E6B7CD1449831C73A204
  • createdAtMillis - 1679913648831
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16402253221917081603DB9A9BFA8F7A17A52D354D21DF008C4029727F3E8F4E6B7CD1449831C73A204