Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-27 10:46:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1D36C10D74A09D663C313A2AEF4E362A9EA538FD59B2498AC55860D54A64B2F9
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the thrust of this tweet is correct (don't rely on it getting things right if it's important), the claim that ChatGPT's error rate is "by design" is false. OpenAI is transparent about ChatGPT's limitations; it is a tech demo, and should be treated as such. https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1640225322191708160
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1D36C10D74A09D663C313A2AEF4E362A9EA538FD59B2498AC55860D54A64B2F9
  • createdAtMillis - 1679914017615
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16402253221917081601D36C10D74A09D663C313A2AEF4E362A9EA538FD59B2498AC55860D54A64B2F9