Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-27 11:25:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0259C42905DD727E998F6B2A1F7C12152E5BD66BEA0F964BC6BC24A4DA9280BA
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the thrust of this tweet is correct (don't rely on it getting things right if it's important), the claim that ChatGPT's error rate is "by design" is false. OpenAI is transparent about ChatGPT's limitations; it is a tech demo, and should be treated as such. https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1640225322191708160
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0259C42905DD727E998F6B2A1F7C12152E5BD66BEA0F964BC6BC24A4DA9280BA
  • createdAtMillis - 1679916341095
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16402253221917081600259C42905DD727E998F6B2A1F7C12152E5BD66BEA0F964BC6BC24A4DA9280BA