Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-27 00:53:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ED9FEBF6DFE2DC4C16716173718CD68F3D514401799B83EE80E40D3C22BB44DE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Caveat Emptor. People can research and interact by word of mouth in the comments section. Too often, even well meaning, readers feel the need to “fact check.” The comments are there for everyone to read. Let’s talk about this and discuss the pros and cons. Let adults, adult.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1640154166839463936
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ED9FEBF6DFE2DC4C16716173718CD68F3D514401799B83EE80E40D3C22BB44DE
  • createdAtMillis - 1679878401373
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1640154166839463936ED9FEBF6DFE2DC4C16716173718CD68F3D514401799B83EE80E40D3C22BB44DE