Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-27 00:55:19 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E1021143B032DB9E7AC5A0BD5D63F30BE432F0FFD9D60567FF0C69BB722FF7D6
Participant Details

Original Note:

Caveat Emptor. People can research and interact by word of mouth in the comments section. Too often, even well meaning, readers feel the need to “fact check.” The comments are there for everyone to read. Let’s talk about this and discuss the pros and cons. Let adults, adult.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1640154166839463936
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E1021143B032DB9E7AC5A0BD5D63F30BE432F0FFD9D60567FF0C69BB722FF7D6
  • createdAtMillis - 1679878519765
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1640154166839463936E1021143B032DB9E7AC5A0BD5D63F30BE432F0FFD9D60567FF0C69BB722FF7D6