Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-31 14:44:11 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8CFD3C4B87DEFD2E808B932B71FC15C87467D38439124F333ED58AFD23C6BB6C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Caveat Emptor. People can research and interact by word of mouth in the comments section. Too often, even well meaning, readers feel the need to “fact check.” The comments are there for everyone to read. Let’s talk about this and discuss the pros and cons. Let adults, adult.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1640154166839463936
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8CFD3C4B87DEFD2E808B932B71FC15C87467D38439124F333ED58AFD23C6BB6C
  • createdAtMillis - 1680273851894
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16401541668394639368CFD3C4B87DEFD2E808B932B71FC15C87467D38439124F333ED58AFD23C6BB6C